Contrast Hardison, 432 You.S.C. § 12111(10)(A) (defining ADA “excessive adversity” standard). Note: Some condition and regional legislation stretch past Label VII with regards to of protected basics secure, new discrimination blocked, the newest accommodation needed, together with judge requirements and you may defenses you to definitely use.
Us, 398 U
Discover, e.grams., Cooper v. Gen. Fictional character, Convair Aerospace Div., 533 F.2d 163, 168 (5th Cir. 1976) (stating “the variations and you will aspects of religion, although not peculiar, is actually protected”).
This well-known elements comes on seminal Best Legal behavior interpreting this new conscience exemption from the Army Selective Provider Work, 50 You.S.C. § 3806(j). Come across, e.grams., Redmond v. GAF Corp., 574 F.2d 897, 901 n.12 (seventh Cir. 1978) (“We feel the right take to getting placed on the fresh new devotion of what actually is ‘religious’ less than § 2000e(j) might be produced by this new Best Legal conclusion inside Welsh v. S. 333 (1970), and you may United states v. Seeger, 380 U.S. 163 (1969), i.elizabeth., (1) is the ‘belief’ for which safeguards are found ‘religious’ in the individuals individual program off some thing, and you may (2) is-it ‘sincerely stored.’” (estimating those people decisions)) ; Fallon v. Mercy Cath. Med. Ctr., 877 F.three-dimensional 487, 490-91 (three-dimensional Cir. 2017) (applying exact same shot so you can Name VII claim out of spiritual discrimination); Davis v. Continue reading