Comparing our very own investigation towards Swedish while the Dutch training has the restrict considering the difference in the learning quantity of the participants. The information and knowledge is actually gathered off first 12 months medical pupils regarding the Andersson research, whereas in our study all the half dozen academical ages you can expect to participate. The attempt systems was basically higher than inside our investigation, and therefore restrictions reviews.

Limits

Our studies has some restrictions that have to be approved. Earliest, new N-GAMS survey has some dangers. The fresh new means is dependent on designed bad stereotypes to which professionals try expected to respond and the elements of such stereotypes was context and day-thread. Hence, an excellent linear translation ones formulations may not always be sufficient. In addition, the employment of bad stereotypes may have triggered a personal desirability effect prejudice. Eventually, a before-translation of your survey of Dutch so you’re able to French wasn’t formally made. However, we did change the fresh new English survey into the French after which back toward English, confronting which adaptation into the one ot the latest top-notch interpreter. We therefore lined up so you’re able to limit the likelihood of misinterpretation.

This new participation rate are lower (23.4%) and you can 8% of one’s people answered but didn’t complete the questionnaire and was basically omitted Baltican vakre kvinner away from analyses. We ergo don’t exclude a variety bias. Indeed, men people were underrepresented along with to be encouraged of the an excellent 2nd note to resolve the fresh questionnaire hence shown success because attempt gender proportion paired the genuine population proportion. Continue reading →